Take a look at the officers of CFS 1004 LIMITED:
I suspect 4 of them are fictitious:
Cfstest TEST.
Test PERSON, of 12 Test Road, Testtown, TE1 2ST
Test PERSON, of 12 Test Street, Testtown, Czech Republic, TE1 2SST,
Test PERSON, of 12 Test Street, Testtown, Estonia TE1 2ST
These look like closed test entries, except for Cfstest TEST that is supposedly still an active Officer and needs to be closed off. Maybe CH should get CFS INTERNATIONAL FORMATIONS LIMITED to tidy this up!!
If you are seeking REAL fiction, possibly with some form of malicious intent, then try these four
11690477 EXCOIN CASH LTD. Inc 21/11/2018
At first sight this is a simple address breach – a new E&W company has managed to register with an address in Scotland. However the address given appears fallacious – the AB42 1ER postcode relates to Balmoor Terrace, Peterhead; there is no evidence that a 48 Witney Way, Kirktown exists on Royal Mail PAF and the only instance of Witney Way is in BOLDON COLLIERY.
SC614789 OK-EARN LTD Inc 27/11/2018
This is a suspicious one in that the given postcode KW11 3SY DOES NOT EXIST and neither does 93 Old Chapel Road, Gearnsary as an address. Gearnsary itself appears to be a small mountain!
SC615383 SKY YIELD ORG LIMITED Inc 04/12/2018
This is another suspicious one in that the given postcode KW3 7FQ also DOES NOT EXIST and neither does 83 Wern Ddu Lane in Lybster. The only Wern Ddu Lane recognised by Royal Mail PAF is in NEWTOWN SY16
SC616462 - MOON GAIN LIMITED Incorporated 18/12/2018 where
a) The postcode does not exist but does match that provided for SKY YIELD ORG LIMITED above, and
b) Blairshinnoch does not have a Thirsk Road and is in the Aberdeen postal area rather than the Kirkwall area.
I cannot think of rational reasons for any of these to be genuine mistakes!
Thank you for reporting these. I have referred them for investigation.
It would be helpful to us, and probably a number of other data consumers / processors, if we knew
What data issues Companies House need / would like to know about, and
How, or to whom, reports should be made to get an effective response.
We currently use the Is there anything wrong with this page? box for the handful of real issues (usually, but not confined to, addresses) that arise but the quality of the responses we get seem to vary depending on who replies and range from outstandingly good to generic brush offs.
Companies House would like to know about all data issues.
Reporting them via Is there anything wrong with this page? and here on the forum is the best way.
Sorry about the quality of responses. We get over 300 reports via Is there anything wrong with this page? and every one has to be investigated. Unfortunately, more than half are a mixture of spam, complaints about the directors being ‘bad’ people and non issues.
Data integrity is a priority here and all reports will be investigated.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to report issues to us, we do appreciate it.
These examples have been forwarded to the Companies House Integrity Team who are investigating.
The company has been contacted and advised that the public record must not be used for test data submissions.