Obviously I’m not Companies House so cannot speak to:
(a) the “correct” name and
(b) allowing companies to register names with variable amounts of whitespace between words
BUT I suspect what is happening here is:
Companies House have allowed this company to register with two spaces in the name - possibly not intentionally e.g. by double-pressing space in a document / via an online submission.
This is correctly reported in data e.g. via the API, however in web pages attention is not often paid to whitespace and - by specification - multiple spaces in the HTML will be rendered as a single space.
This appears to be the case as by viewing the page source e.g. in the search for this name - you can see there are indeed two spaces (I’ve highlighted this):
Our view is that there is an embedded gremlin at work here and that double spaces should nor form part of the name.
Each day generally produces a few (say, six or seven tops) new registrations with names that contain one or more double spaces. We strip them out before the incoming data is processed to our database unless there is clear evidence to the contrary within the incorporation images.
I picked up on the point Frank makes with the incorporation image and for this company, with the aid of some OCR on the pdf image, there is only one space, at all points, in this company name.
How then can Companies House hold the name with two spaces, as detailed?
I think the embedded gremlin thought may have some merit here.
Perhaps the Admin’s can join in with the actual rules/theories or issues at play here.
This one was an “electronic filing” e.g. online - IN01(ef). So I imagine that system (or its interface - again this could be user error plus failure to filter these out…) would be the place for them to start.
This has been raised here before it seems - although extra spaces by “limited” or “ltd” may have been fixed:
The example here was in e.g. officer names - but possibly part of the same general principle?