Corporate-looking Officers encoded as natural persons

I identified records in the Officers bulk export represented as natural-person Officers that have blank forenames and corporate legal names, for example “KINGSWAY SECRETARIAL LIMITED”, “PELICAN SECRETARIES LIMITED”, and “LADBROKE CORPORATE DIRECTOR LIMITED”. In one case, “ABACO CORPORATE DIRECTOR LIMITED” also carries a month/year DOB.

Some examples:
Each was parsed as natural_person despite an empty forenames field and an evidently corporate appointment name:

Company no. Officer name Officer source ID Source record
00000121 KINGSWAY SECRETARIAL LIMITED 000959563400 129
00000121 PELICAN SECRETARIES LIMITED 020080676200 130
00000182 ROYSUN LIMITED 001520977500 224
00000529 BRITISH LAND COMPANY SECRETARIAL LIMITED 001878566700 412
00000785 LADBROKE CORPORATE SECRETARIES LIMITED 020605307700 593
00000785 LADBROKE CORPORATE DIRECTOR LIMITED 030623604600 605

This is not confined to legacy records. In the 3 August 2026 Officers bulk snapshot, records with appointment date 3 August 2026 including “Brodies Secretarial Services Limited”, “Aztec Financial Services (Jersey) Limited”, “Squire Patton Boggs Directors Limited”, and “Getground Secretary Limited” were represented through natural-person-shaped Officer records with blank forenames.

Company no. Officer name Officer source ID Source record
SC897945 BRODIES SECRETARIAL SERVICES LIMITED 003510826600 Prod216_4277_sc.dat, record 3,660,841
OC385519 TETRACTYS HOLDINGS LIMITED 053510790700 Prod216_4277_ew_7.dat, record 7,549,120
17378347 AZTEC FINANCIAL SERVICES (JERSEY) LIMITED 003510881100 Prod216_4277_ew_7.dat, record 6,734,797
17378262 SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS DIRECTORS LIMITED 013510866900 Prod216_4277_ew_7.dat, record 6,734,603
17378262 SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS SECRETARIES LIMITED 003510867000 Prod216_4277_ew_7.dat, record 6,734,602
17377808 WINKIE CORPORATE SERVICES (UK) LIMITED 003510789100 Prod216_4277_ew_7.dat, record 6,733,573
17377662 GETGROUND SECRETARY LIMITED 003510766600 Prod216_4277_ew_7.dat, record 6,733,219

Please confirm whether this is intentional bulk-format semantics; otherwise, what is the process for me to formally request that these are reclassified as corporate Officer entities and to not supply inapplicable personal fields?