# Officers with name of '.'

**URL:** <http://forum.companieshouse.gov.uk/t/officers-with-name-of/394>\
**Category:** API Issues\
**Created:** [December 27, 2015, 5:57pm UTC](http://forum.companieshouse.gov.uk/t/officers-with-name-of/394 "2015-12-27T17:57:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chris\_taggart](http://forum.companieshouse.gov.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ea5d25/32.png) [@chris\_taggart](http://forum.companieshouse.gov.uk/u/chris_taggart)\
**Post date:** [December 27, 2015, 5:57pm UTC](http://forum.companieshouse.gov.uk/t/officers-with-name-of/394/1 "2015-12-27T17:57:47Z")

</div>

Is this correct, or bad data:  
/company/07257851/officers  
[Note both officers appear to have full points for both names]:

{  
“start\_index”: 0,  
“total\_results”: 2,  
“items”: [  
{  
“name”: “., .”,  
“appointed\_on”: “2010-05-18”,  
“address”: {  
“country”: “United Kingdom”  
},  
“links”: {  
“officer”: {  
“appointments”: “/officers/YwFlGJPzX3XIt0a\_I6lffTmVnsw/appointments”  
}  
},  
“officer\_role”: “secretary”  
},  
{  
“officer\_role”: “director”,  
“links”: {  
“officer”: {  
“appointments”: “/officers/3XNOpTns7OqG6kXIWxdfoiUA-jg/appointments”  
}  
},  
“address”: {  
“country”: “United Kingdom”  
},  
“occupation”: “Accountant”,  
“name”: “., .”,  
“appointed\_on”: “2010-05-18”,  
“nationality”: “British”  
}  
],  
“kind”: “officer-list”,  
“links”: {  
“self”: “/company/07257851/appointments”  
},  
“etag”: “d5b33f0c3822ea9e5ecb68c48ffcebe8fe3d7e71”,  
“resigned\_count”: 0,  
“active\_count”: 2,  
“items\_per\_page”: 35  
}

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mfairhurst](http://forum.companieshouse.gov.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/bbce88/32.png) [@mfairhurst](http://forum.companieshouse.gov.uk/u/mfairhurst)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2016, 12:44pm UTC](http://forum.companieshouse.gov.uk/t/officers-with-name-of/394/2 "2016-01-05T12:44:00Z")

</div>

@chris_taggart

Technically this is bad data as the officers have been removed from the record and shouldn’t be displayed. Will investigate correcting this data.

Thanks

@mfairhurst